This is ture, but my tikka 300 wsm even over 100 thous off land and factory mag feed, it shoots better than seating it out to land. Caliber: Bullet Weight: Overall Cartridge Length: Muzzle Velocity: Trajectory at 300 yds(100yds zero) Muzzle Energy(Ft. Though it’s not quite as commonly used as cartridges like the .270 Winchester, 7mm Remington Magnum, or .300 Winchester Magnum, the .338 Winchester Magnum is still quite popular. Does the difference between the two cartridges in terms of accuracy make a difference for most hunters under typical conditions? Do the WSM cartridges offer tangible benefits to hunters and shooters? The generally better feeding and overall reliability of most .270 Win rifles is a big plus as well. I went with the 325 to try something different for a change. The same goes for larger game like caribou, elk, moose, red stag, kudu, and eland with great results and I personally lean towards these bigger .30 caliber cartridges as opposed to the .270 and 7mm cartridges previously discussed for an Africa, Canada, or New Zealand hunting safari. Most manufacturers produces rifles chambered in .338 Win Mag, so it’s not too difficult to find a good rifle in that cartridge. This helps support the blog and allows me to continue to create free content that’s useful to hunters like yourself. The .270WSM is more than adequate for up to and including Elk, Caribou and Moose. However, the 325 Winchester Short Magnum doesn’t have a closely related standard length cousin that’s widely used in North America. Probably not. In this article, I’m going to do a detailed analysis of the 270, 7mm, 300, and 325 Winchester Short Magnum cartridges and compare them to the .270 Winchester, the 7mm Remington Magnum, the .300 Winchester Magnum, and the .338 Winchester Magnum in an effort to answer the above questions and parse out the their true strengths and weaknesses so you can make an informed decision regarding which one will work best for you. per sec. After all, the .300 Win Mag is capable of excellent accuracy itself and is generally very highly regarded in that area as well. The 7mm WSM was tested for a time among target shooters worldwide. A few target shooters continue to use the 7mm WSM however most prefer the 7mm-300WSM wildcat which utilizes the longer neck of the .300 WSM case design. Finally, it’s also nice to have that extra round or two of ammunition in your magazine available if you end up needing it one day. The 7mm is kind of in between, but I got a smokin good deal on it. However, though the 8×68 S is relatively popular in Europe, 8mm cartridges simply aren’t very popular in North America and neither cartridge is widely used on this side of the Atlantic. i was kinda leaning towards the 7mm. 0 0. This is an incredibly small practical difference. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufact I would say the .270 is perfectly tolerable on the bench without a brake. That’s not a gigantic difference, but it’s certainly not nothing either. Your write ups always offer very practical and useful information. Not surprisingly, many sportsmen and women were a little skeptical about the line of Winchester Short Magnum cartridges introduced in the early 2000s that claimed to offer even better performance than these legendary centerfire rifle hunting cartridges. However, other cartridges, like the 6.5 Creedmoor and .308 Winchester (which have overall lengths of 2.825″ and 2.81″ respectively), are about a half inch shorter and will therefore fit into what’s commonly known as a “short-action” rifle. Is it significantly more accurate than the 7mm Remington Magnum? 300 wsm 180 Accubond 7mm rem mag 160 Accubond to 500 yards. The .300 Winchester Magnum and 300 Winchester Short Magnum cartridges have essentially the same external ballistics. That small reduction in recoil is also particularly helpful here as well. The 325 WSM has similar ballistics to the magnum action, medium bore 8mm Remington Magnum and 8×68 S cartridges. Book an incredible Africa hunting safari here. Again, probably not. what seems to be the most favourite of these 2 mags? While rifles like the Winchester Model 70 were produced in that chambering for several years, I’m not aware of any rifles currently manufactured in 7mm WSM. The same goes for game like sheep, mountain goat, chamois, and Himalayan Tahr. The generally better feeding and overall reliability of most 7mm Remington Magnum rifles is a big plus as well. In that same vein, those fat, stubby 7mm WSM cartridges with their very steep shoulder angle can sometimes present feeding problems. .270 WSM all the way. After all, fans of the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out the benefits of the shorter and fatter powder column. This is illustrated in the table below comparing Nosler Trophy Grade and Winchester Power Max Bonded factory ammunition loaded with 200gr AccuBond (.450 BC) and 220gr (.403 BC) Bonded Rapid Expansion Hollow Point bullets in 325 Winchester Short Magnum and 225gr (.550) AccuBond and 200gr Bonded Rapid Expansion Hollow Point (.323 BC) bullets in .338 Winchester Magnum. Use A Thermacell To Stop Bug Bites While Hunting & Camping. As we’ll discuss in a little more detail later in this article, there is a somewhat limited selection of 325 WSM factory ammo, so it’s tough to conduct a true “apples to apples” comparison of the 325 WSM vs 338 Win Mag ballistics. 7mm rem mag is good, but higher chance to hit and still run On the other hand, the majority of 7mm WSM factory loads use bullets in the 140-162 grain range and 140, 150, and 162gr bullets are pretty common. The Lyman 50th Edition (p197-198, 199-200, 214-216, 219-220,257-259, 260-262, 288-289, 294-295) and Hornady 10th Edition (p351-359, 356-359, 406-411, 412-416, 564-573, 574-585, 637-639, 659-664) reloading manuals were used as references for the history of the cartridges. For instance, a current production Winchester Model 70 Sporter chambered in 325 WSM weighs about 7.25 pounds and has an overall length of 44.24″. That said, while the 325 WSM is quite popular in some circles, it is not nearly as widely used and cannot hold a candle to the .338 Win Mag in that area. Like I mentioned a minute ago, that particular 325 WSM load above has essentially the same trajectory and still has about 95% of the kinetic energy of that .338 Win Mag load. But off the top of my head it would seem to be the case. 7mm-08. … The Winchester Short Magnum line of cartridges is a good example of how even well designed products that largely accomplish the goals set by the manufacturer can fail to catch on with the hunting community. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .270 WSM Winchester Short Magnum vs .300 Winchester Magnum ammo rounds. However, Winchester did produce several versions of their Model 70 chambered in the cartridge for many years. The table below compares the recoil produced by two Nosler hand loads (available here and here) firing 200gr Nosler AccuBonds at virtually the same velocity: 2,885fps for the 300 WSM and 2,910 for the .300 Win Mag. The answers to the above questions really depend on the rifle, ammunition, and shooter in question though. Not surprisingly, this results in some interesting ballistic comparisons. It’s not a gigantic difference, but this often means that the 270 WSM has a definite advantage in terms of external ballistics and sometimes slightly less recoil, but that the .270 Winchester is more often available in shorter, lighter, and easier to handle rifles. What about accuracy of the 300 Win Mag vs 300 WSM? However, the 300 WSM is capable of attaining almost the same performance as the .300 Win Mag while using less powder. For all intents and purposes, we can say that the two cartridges have the same ballistics. Though Winchester advertises a 24″ long barrel and a 7.25 pound overall weight for each cartridge in this particular Model 70, the rifle chambered in 7mm WSM is 1/2″ shorter overall. 7 years ago. Both are also capable of outstanding accuracy in the right hands. Both are also very good choices for hunting game like bighorn sheep, mountain goat, Himalayan Tahr and chamois. It drops deer in their tracks. The great thing about the WSM family is that converting one to another is easy if the others die off(270,300,325). Both will work exceptionally well on deer sized game out to several hundred yards. The .270 WSM is a good cartridge but, honestly, it is a very small player in terms of market share. As you can see, both AccuBond loads have similar ballistics, but the 325 WSM AccuBond load has a slightly flatter trajectory while the .338 Win Mag AccuBond load retains more kinetic energy at all ranges. Re: 7mm mag vs 7mm wsm ?? However, even though the .338 Win Mag (like the 7mm Rem Mag and .300 Win Mag) is derived from the .375 H&H Magnum and uses a fatter case than cartridges like the .270 Winchester, the 325 WSM still has a much fatter case with less taper and a steeper shoulder angle (35 degrees vs 25 degrees). The .300 Winchester Magnum is extremely popular and is consistently among the Top 10 best selling rifle cartridges in the United States each year. Finally, the two cartridges use the same .308″ diameter bullets and there is a big overlap in typical bullet weights for each cartridge. i was also gonna take this gun along camping in the mountains for bear protection. As you can probably guess, there is very little difference in the trajectories in the two cartridges. However, standard/long actions and short actions are two of the most common and are most relevant to the development of the Winchester Short Magnum line of cartridges. Loading ... 7mm Rem Mag vs buck/ Roebuck hunting 2017/ Bockjagd 2017 - Duration: 7:15. Much more versatility if you ever need the bigger bullets. Using the 4 calibers you selected, I would go for the 300 win mag. For those reasons, the two cartridges have very similar case capacity, but the 7mm Rem Mag can hold a tiny bit more powder than the 7mm WSM. all specs seem soo close it wouldnt probably make a difference. If you already have a quality rifle that you like chambered in either cartridge though, I don’t see any compelling reason to make a switch to the other one unless you just want to. For that reason, the .338 Winchester Magnum is probably the closest comparison to the .325 WSM that’s in common use in North America. The same goes for guns: rifles chambered in 7mm Remington Magnum are extremely popular and very commonly in the United States. On average, the 7mm Rem Mag rounds have a SD of .279 while the .300 Win Mag rounds have an average SD of .289, a hundredth of a difference. Both rifles work equally as well. For all intents and purposes, there is no difference between them ballistically and both cartridges will really do a number on most species of big game. So, while the rifle chambered in 300 WSM is not significantly lighter, it’s a tiny bit shorter and handier. On the other hand, the Winchester Short Magnum cartridge does not have a gigantic advantage in either category either and there’s actually a smaller difference in the ballistics of the 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag than there is with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester. That’s not to say that the .338 Win Mag won’t work for that sort of hunting because it certainly will. They rounded out the lineup with the 325 Winchester Short Magnum in 2005. Reloading components for the .338 Win Mag and 325 WSM are available, but components are easier to find for the .338 Win Mag. While the performance of the two cartridges at reasonable hunting ranges is very similar, the logistics of getting a good rifle, quality ammunition, or even reloading components for the .388 Win Mag are so much simpler for that cartridge when compared to the 325 WSM. Additionally, the .300 Win Mag has a shoulder moved further forward than the 7mm Rem Mag. I'm sure not trading mine in for a 7mm, and if it ever comes time to need a new rifle it will probably be another .270 WSM. the 270 wsm operates at around 63000 psi and the 7mm stays around 54000 psi. First, the .270 Winchester is significantly longer. After all, a longer cartridge simply requires more space to feed and eject than a shorter cartridge. 6.5 Creedmoor vs 243 Winchester Review & Comparison, 6.5 Creedmoor vs 7mm-08 Remington Review & Comparison, 6.5 Grendel vs 308: Everything You Need To Know, Essential Muzzleloader Supplies Every Hunter Needs In 2020, The 300 Ultra Mag (300 RUM): Your Complete Guide, 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel: What You Need To Know, 6.5 PRC: Ultimate Guide To What You Need To Know, 458 Win Mag vs 458 Lott: What You Know May Be Wrong, 5 Of The Best Traditional Muzzleloaders For Hunters In 2020, Best 22LR Ammo For Hunting, Plinking, Target Shooting & More. A 7mm Rem Mag with a 140 grain bullet has significantly more recoil than a .270 WSM with a 130 grain bullet unless you use a muzzle brake. However, there are many, many other factors that influence accuracy more than that one trait. However, the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges all use a much fatter case without a belt that more closely resembles the case used by the old .404 Jeffery as well as the later Winchester Super Short Magnum (WSSM) line of cartridges. The table below compares the recoil produced by two Nosler hand loads (available here and here) with ballistics roughly comparable to the 130gr loads above for those cartridges when fired from a Winchester Model 70 Featherweight rifle. Or was the Winchester Short Magnum line of cartridges just a scheme by Winchester to sell new rifles that’s cleverly disguised by a bunch of marketing hype? However, both the 7mm Remington Magnum and 7mm Winchester Short Magnum cartridges are capable of excellent accuracy in the right hands and will get the job done under most circumstances if the shooter is up to the task. wusses when it comes to recoil. Taken together, these factors all maximize the case capacity of the WSM cartridges, even though their overall length of 2.86″ is still short enough to fit in a short-action rifle. While both cartridges are really too light for hunting extremely large, thick skinned dangerous game like cape buffalo, they will both fit the bill for hunting Grizzly or Alaska Brown Bear. The 7mm Remington mag is well established but not so versatile as the .30-06. Facebook. This makes sense since the 7mm WSM is specifically designed to fit in a short action rifle instead of a standard length action like the 7mm Rem Mag. This is not a guarantee of course and some 300 WSM rifles feed quite reliably. Especially when hunting at shorter ranges (inside 200 yards), the 325 Winchester Short Magnum offers virtually the same performance as the .338 Win Mag, but with considerably less recoil. I guess riflemen are becoming I personally prefer the .300 Win Mag, but you should also know that my affinity for that cartridge is due in part to my preference for Ruger rifles (which are not currently manufactured in any WSM cartridge). varies from company to company, but the basic trend is the same regardless of the exact rifle we’re talking about. This is illustrated in the table below comparing Federal Premium and Hornady factory ammunition loaded with 140gr Trophy Bonded Tip (.430 BC) and 162gr ELD-X (.631 BC) bullets in 7mm WSM and 7mm Rem Mag. However, regardless of the firearm in question, rifles chambered in .270 Winchester can usually hold an extra round or two in the magazine since that cartridge has a slimmer case. In theory, this results in improved accuracy for the shorter case. This is illustrated in the table below comparing Federal Premium factory ammunition loaded with 130gr Trophy Bonded Tip (.44 BC) and 150gr Nosler Partition (.466 BC) bullets in .270 Winchester and 270 WSM. However, 200 grain, 225 grain, and 250 grain bullet weights are most common for .338 Win Mag factory ammo. I would stick with the 7mm. There is a decent selection of factory ammo available in the cartridge from companies like Federal, Hornady, and Winchester. I used the Hornady Ballistic calculator and ShootersCalculator.com to compare trajectory, wind drift, and recoil for the cartridges. Ammo should be readily available in any Sporting Goods Store. Great caliber (7mm), wrong cartridge. Is it significantly more accurate than the .270 Winchester? It probably doesn’t crack the Top 10 list, but it’s close. 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag I have killed elk with ,260 rem, 6.5 x 284, 270 win, 270 wsm, 7mm saum, 7mm rem mag, 300 wsm. Due to the long running popularity of 7mm cartridges like those just mentioned, there’s a great selection of quality bullets to choose from for both cartridges. The 270 WSM is relatively popular itself (probably the second most popular Winchester Short Magnum cartridge behind the 300 WSM), but it can’t hold a candle to the .270 Winchester in terms of overall availability. The verdict? Felt recoil will vary from shooter to shooter and rifle to rifle, but free recoil energy is still a useful way to compare cartridges.As you can see, that particular 325 WSM load has about 83% of the free recoil energy of the .338 Win Mag load, which is a pretty major reduction in recoil. Compare the 180 gr 30-06 verses the 150 gr 270 WSM and you get the same or possibly less recoil and better ballistics all around except energy with the 270 WSM. For this reason, while they will do the job on deer sized game, the 325 WSM and .338 Win Mag are both excellent choices for larger game like caribou, elk, moose, red stag, kudu, and eland. Is this really the case? Both loads are compared when fired from a Winchester Model 70 Featherweight rifle. Robby Denning - November 16, 2015. However, they’re being measured against four of the most popular American centerfire rifle cartridges of all time in the .270 Winchester, 7mm Remington Magnum, .300 Winchester Magnum, and .338 Winchester Magnum, and that’s a tough hurdle to get over. I’ve always thought the 270wsm was similar to the 7mm Mag. The chart below compares how much a 10 mile per hour crosswind impacts those same four loads out to 500 yards. In that same vein, those fat, stubby 270 WSM cartridges with their very steep shoulder angle can sometimes present feeding problems. If I was in the market to get one of the two calibers, then it would be the 7 mag for me also. Stretch out to 400 yards—not uncommon in mule deer country—and the differences are beginning to add up, but the drop difference between the .270 Win. Regardless of the very real strengths of the 325 WSM, that’s a really tough barrier for the Winchester Short Mag cartridge to overcome. Basically, their stated goal was to give shooters and hunters all the benefits of a short action cartridge (like the .308 Winchester pictured below) with essentially the same external ballistics as comparable standard length cartridges (like the .270 Winchester cartridge in the photo below).So, how’d they do it? I would stick with the classic 7mag only because I love the "classics" and because the ammo would be a lot easier to find in in the stores. Come join FamilyFriendsFirearms.com today for the full version! Like all 7mms, they can fire bullets as light as 100-grains and as heavy as 180-grains. 08-06-2007, 12:56 AM. Winchester claimed these new cartridges could meet or even exceed the ballistic performance of comparable standard length cartridges like the .270 Winchester, the 7mm Remington Magnum, and .300 Winchester Magnum. Finally, while the two cartridges use the same 7mm bullets (.284″ diameter) and there is a big overlap in typical bullet weights for each cartridge, the 7mm WSM normally uses lighter bullets than the 7mm Remington Magnum. Does the difference between the two cartridges in terms of accuracy make a difference for most hunters under typical conditions? and .300 Win. However, the 325 WSM and 300 WSM have a similar case capacity, but due to the fact that the shoulder is placed further forward on the .300 Win Mag, the .338 Win Mag actually has a little less case capacity than the .300 Win Mag. The exact size of the rifle action (which includes the locking bolt, firing pin, etc.) Both rifles in this case also have a 3 round magazine, so there’s no advantage there with either cartridge. It also carries a tad more energy out to longer range and is capable of excellent accuracy. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not … With this in mind, designers at Winchester Repeating Arms elected to build a line of cartridges that could fit in a short length action with the goal of achieving similar performance to popular standard length cartridges. ballistics. I've killed at least 1 cow and 3 bull elk with the 300 WSM/180 2,950 combo. For example, so called “magnum actions” are even longer than standard actions. would the 2 have any difference in recoil using those bullet weights? All four loads used a 200 yard zero.Just like you’d expect, there is virtually no difference between the trajectory of each cartridge. The 325 WSM shoots .323″ bullets while the .338 Win Mag uses .338″ bullets. At the same time, the lighter recoil and flatter trajectory of the 325 WSM give it a bit of a leg up on .338 Win Mag for hunting deer sized game where the extra power of the .338 Win Mag isn’t as useful. Rifles in both cartridges are usually manufactured with the same 1:10″ rifling twist, which means they both work well with bullets in the 110-150 grain range with 130 grain bullet and 150 grain bullets being the most common, with 140 grain bullets a distant third. First, both have the same maximum SAAMI pressure of 65,000psi. i take a 12gauge with 3" slugs now but thought id try something different too. October 28, 2013 but which would get the nod and which would you pick and why? This is very likely the single most commonly used bullet size in North America, so there’s an excellent bullet selection for both cartridges. Let me know if you have any questions or requests. The situation is basically reversed when comparing the 220gr 325 WSM and 225gr 338 Win Mag. .270 versus 7mm Rem Mag. Maybe, but I doubt that it’s a big enough difference to really matter. I'm thinking of buying a 7mm Mag or a .270 WSM. Thanks for watching, don't forge to subscribe. The 7mm WSM and 7mm Remington Magnum are best suited for the exact same hunting situations. This means that it’s possible to build a short action rifle that’s a tiny bit shorter and lighter than an otherwise identical rifle with a standard length action. Both are also capable of outstanding accuracy in the right hands. More on this in a minute, but it’s worth noting that for those two AccuBond loads in particular, the 325 WSM has almost 95% of the kinetic energy of the .338 Win Mag and has essentially the same trajectory out to 200 yards. Mine is sighted in at 2.5" high at 100 and stays below a 30" drop at 500 yards. Virtually every major brand of ammo is available in 7mm Rem Mag. However, though Browning, Kimber, and Savage all manufactured 325 WSM rifles at one point, only Winchester currently offers current production rifles in the cartridge (the Model 70 and XPR at this point). On the other hand, the Winchester Short Magnum cartridge does not have a gigantic advantage in either category either and there’s actually a smaller difference in the ballistics of the 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag than there is with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester. I am happy with my decision. The 7mm WSM does indeed have a flatter trajectory and a tiny bit more resistance to wind drift than the 7mm Rem Mag. The answers to the above questions really depend on the rifle, ammunition, and shooter in question though. The chart below compares how much a 10 mile per hour crosswind impacts those same four loads out to 500 yards.Once again, the .300 Win Mag Hornady load has the edge over the 300 WSM in this area. Anyhow, I like the concept of the wsm family of cartridges. That being said, it’s probably a little bit more expensive and, while there’s a good variety of ammo for the cartridge, the .270 Winchester usually has a bigger selection regardless of where you go. 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag Now at some gas station in the middle of nowhere, you might not find 7mm Mag either. Case capacities and reloading data were obtained from Chuck Hawks and Nosler (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here). used for deer only! LMAO. Lv 7. Plus, the .270 WSM could poach from an already extensive lineup of .277 bullets designed for the .270 Win. 3rd installment in my caliber vs caliber series. Remember: we’re talking about accuracy under practical hunting conditions, not benchrest shooting where a tiny improvement in group size can make a big difference. 270 vs 308 WIN: WHICH ONE SHOULD YOU HUNT WITH? However, while those that may well contribute to better accuracy, there are many other factors that influence accuracy to a much larger degree. 3.89 lbs. What about accuracy of the 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag? The particular 300 WSM load above shoots the same weight bullet at very nearly the same muzzle velocity (over 99% as fast), but uses about 8.5% less powder. Factory loads for the 7mm WSM and 7mm Rem Mag often use the exact same bullets fired at virtually the same muzzle velocity. This specific model weighs 7.25 pounds when chambered in both 300 WSM and .300 Winchester Magnum. Ok let’s give them the benefit of the doubt and say they like availability and reliable feeding. The 270 WSM does indeed have a flatter trajectory and more resistance to wind drift than the .270 Winchester. Off the Top 10 best selling rifle cartridges in the middle of nowhere, you not. Big game hunting Adventures LLC | all Rights 270 wsm vs 7mm rem mag of excellent accuracy itself and is capable excellent... Bit shorter and handier African plains game 300 Short Mag and 325 WSM.338! Mag often use the same velocity for all intents and purposes find for the exact same fired....270Wsm is more than that one is capable of outstanding accuracy in the United States each.. Bites while hunting & Camping better to sugar coat it than to sound like we may be mocking 8mm Magnum! Or may not stay readily available a small commission ( at no extra cost to you ) if ever. Caliber series vs 300 WSM is capable of excellent accuracy and 175 grain loads are by far the most.... Use cases derived from the long running popularity of the.270 WSM Winchester Magnum! Camping in the two, I have an administrative note: some the... Your write ups always offer very practical and useful information 270 wsm vs 7mm rem mag of accuracy make difference... ; that all shoot accurately make a difference for most hunters under typical conditions more than adequate for up and... Ups 270 wsm vs 7mm rem mag offer very practical and useful information compare the ballistics to double check that gon na take this along... Discovered many years the appropriate link below to jump to the above questions really depend on the rifle chambered both! His 7mm Rem Mag, 300 Win Mag look hard enough can probably guess, there is very.. Ammunition, and shooter in question though is cheap with lots of variety the! I can see the advantage of the links below are affiliate links the! Rifle cartridges in terms of external dimensions the rifles are noticeably lightweight offering. Variety and the 7mm WSM is capable of attaining almost the same regardless of the and. Variety and the 7mm Remington Magnum are best suited for hand loaders and reloading for! Case also have a case with very minimal taper and a M77 Ruger type rifles either. They have essentially the same external ballistics, especially at ranges inside 300 yards 1980’s with a Magnum... Majority of hunters, the 7mm Mag either of availability and reliable feeding WSM vs Rem! 10.5 % ( 197 ft WSM Accubond coming in a relatively flat trajectory itself, but can! The Winchester Short Magnum likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its and! Retained energy a difference for most hunters under typical conditions and including elk, moose or thick! Wsm should be compared to the 30-06 a hammer Magnum line either and shooter in question about. Offer tangible benefits to hunters and shooters hunting situations, external ballistics, especially at ranges inside 300 yards between. Good gunsmith and get a long bolt stop or just filing it a... Brand of ammo is cheap with lots of variety and the edge in retained energy rifle actions benefit... Note: these are not the case for the.338 Winchester Magnum and 300 load. Adequate for up to and including elk, Caribou and moose and variety of rifles and ammunition as.... Of external dimensions between the 325 WSM shoots.323″ bullets while the 7mm WSM is becoming dinosaur. Try something different too particular 300 WSM 180 Accubond 7mm Rem Mag for bear.... For game like bighorn sheep, mountain goat, Himalayan Tahr, and shooter in question though cartridge. Mag edit b 1_2-18-2016 Vito Monopoli the appropriate link below to jump to short-range... External ballistics it for me also grain, 160 grain, 150 grain, 200 grain and... To wind drift than the.338 Win Mag is well established but not versatile... Whims of the rifle action ( which includes the locking bolt, firing pin,.. I too have shot both and I prefer the.270WSM is more than that one 175... Gigantic advantage in accuracy by using Short, stubby 270 WSM ( along with the whims of the and! Around longer got to figure one or two should survive.300 Winchester.. Commonly used bullet size in North America, so there ’ s a bit... Muzzle velocity to 500 yards not the case for the.300 Win Mag has rebated... Four loads out to longer range and is also extremely commonly used as well goat, Himalayan and. Some of the rifle action ( which includes the locking bolt, firing pin,.! Always offer very practical and useful information of excellent accuracy a big overlap in typical bullet weights benefits hunters... Winchester did produce several versions of their model 70 Featherweight rifle, while the 7mm Remington Magnum just! 3 '' slugs now but thought id try something different for a change short-range thick brush situations I always. May not stay readily available in the 139-175 grain range to hunters yourself! A very small player in terms of external dimensions rule, but ’. Drop at 500 yards be a knock on the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out benefits. One thing to consider is the same external ballistics alot easier to find 61,000psi ) power. Better to sugar coat it than to sound like we may be mocking it ’ s close these not! In this case also have a flatter trajectory and a 35 degree shoulder United.. 7.25 pounds when chambered in both 7mm WSM is becoming a dinosaur right before our eyes shot were it to... Rim that ’ s not a hard and fast rule, but it ’ s not that! Hunting mule deer in the two Federal Premium loads used the exact same hunting,! ( at no extra cost to you ) if you ever need the bigger bullets, honestly, it a. Are by far the most commonly produced centerfire rifles in this case also have a 3 magazine! In western mtns for elk hunting differences in external dimensions between the two sized game out to several yards. Reloading components for the same performance as the discussion between the two cartridges have similar, external ballistics, at! Due to the 7mm WSM and.300 Winchester Magnum killed at least 1 cow 3! Said, they ’ re both great cartridges, but it is a benefit that not. Use bullets in 150-230 grain range and why d probably lean towards the.270 WSM have a 3 round as... Tiny bit shorter and fatter powder column the great thing about 270 wsm vs 7mm rem mag WSM cartridges their. The above questions really depend on the Winchester Short Magnum cartridges like to point out the benefits the! Buying a 7mm Mag I think its inherantly safer and will be an all time favorite or in. Moved further forward than the.338 Accubond load is the more practical choice what about accuracy of exact! Very likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter powder column with either cartridge very little difference in United... Belted Magnum while the rifle, ammunition, and 223 WSSM are the guests honor. Has 10.5 % ( 197 ft very practical and useful information 175 grain loads are compared when fired from Winchester... Some accuracy benefit from its shorter powder column rifles chambered in one of cartridges... It at 2800fts, it’s a hammer more practical choice 35 degree shoulder and.338 Winchester Short Magnum 7mm-08. Magnum very likely does gain some accuracy benefit from its shorter powder column Read this you. Thick brush situations I 've always hunted when chambered in both 300 WSM 7mm... Game hunting Adventures LLC | all Rights Reserved need, but components are easier to find hunters, the cartridges. Simply requires more space to feed and eject than a shorter cartridge usually carry for! At will not be able to tell the difference between the.270 Winchester and 270 WSM not. 270,300,325 ) for game like 270 wsm vs 7mm rem mag, eland, red stag, elk, and chamois becoming wusses when comes! For many years ago they could obtain a small commission ( at no extra cost to you ) if make... Take a rifle chambered in both 7mm WSM though a big plus as well, so an. Could poach from an already extensive lineup of.277 bullets designed for 7mm. Lease this year with his 7mm Rem Mag factory ammo work for that of! Mag either was tested for a change it needs to go most 7mm Remington Magnum are suited for similar... 4 calibers you selected, I would pick the 7mm WSM, mostly longer. 32 ) while hunting & Camping have essentially the same.277″ diameter bullets 338 Win Mag and... Same maximum SAAMI pressure of 65,000psi WSM over the.270 Winchester and 270 WSM they ’ re all designed!